Systematic review for informed consent Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Systematic review for informed consent - Essay exemplarBased on these factors every systemic review research is prone criticism, in addition, the same principle applies to primary research. Apart from the possibility of making un knowledgeable errors, researchers conducting systemic reviews may make mistakes which are largely influenced by the publication aspirations. This is referred to as publication bias, and often involves the alteration or misguided opinion on results by researchers as they attempt to attain positive results for their work to be published (Petticrew & Roberts, 2006). Researchers also have the professional obligation to constantly update their knowledge as there are constantly new developments in science and certain information may be out of date. Therefore, recommendation by the Cochrane collaborationism state that reviews should be updated every two years and if an update is not conducted there should an explanation why updating was not carried out. Accordin g to Higgins and Greens (2009), the Cochrane coaction body states that researchers should search the literature for related subjects twice a year. Reviews are very strenuous and require a large amount of time and committedness hence there are also financial be that must be considered. (Hopewell et al., 2007) as well as other resources have indicated that the financial costs include staffing and time allocation. The nature or type of study is also at the researchers discretion these are mainly determined by the researchers personal beliefs or